Real Situation of Construction of New Rural Resources in Vietnam River Delta

Author(s)

Thi Phuong Thao Pham , Thuy Linh Tran , Mai Thanh Nong ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 130-144 | Views: 635 | Downloads: 138 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4572801

Volume 10 - January 2021 (01)

Abstract

Socio-economic development of rural areas in the Red River Delta is unsustainable, the efficiency of resource use is still low, reflecting: environmental pollution, labor productivity and competitiveness of many products are not yet comparable. is commensurate with the existing potentials and advantages and is still far behind in some rural countries in the region. Therefore, researching as well as giving suitable solutions to promote rural development of the Red River Delta is very necessary in the present conditions. In the framework of this article, the author only mentions some main aspects of the current state of rural production development in the Red River Delta and a number of raised issues, on that basis providing a number of solutions. to contribute to promoting rural production in the Red River Delta in the coming time.

Keywords

New countryside, rural, Red River Delta, Vietnam.

References

                   i.            Abbott. J (1995), ‘Community participation and its relationship to Community Development’, Community Development Journal, 30 (2), pp. 158-168.

      ii.            Ahmad. S. M and Talib. A. N Bt (2011), ‘Decentralization and Participatory Rural Development: A Literature Review’, Contemporary economics, 5 (4), 58-67.

    iii.            Ameha. A., et al (2014), 'Impacts of access and benefit sharing on livelihoods and forest: Case of participatory forest management in Ethiopia', Ecological Economics, 97, pp. 162 - 171.

     iv.            Aref. F (2011), ‘Farmers’ participation in agricultural development: The case of Fars province, Iran’, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 4 (2), 155-158.

       v.            Arnstein. S. R (1969), 'A ladder of citizen participation', Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), pp. 216 - 224.

     vi.            Aylett. A (2010), 'Participatory planning, justice, and climate change in Durban, South Africa', Environment and Planning A, 42, pp. 99-115.

   vii.            Bachmann. L. P., et al (2007), ‘Analysis of the citizen’s participation concept  used by local decision makers: the case of the Aysén watershed in  southern Chile’, Int. J. Sustainable Development, 3 (10), pp. 251-266.

 viii.            Chen. Y, Lu. B and Chen. R (2016), ‘Evaluating the life satisfaction of peasants   in concentrated residential areas of Nanjing, China: A fuzzy approach’, Habitat International, 53, 556-568.

     ix.            Chhetri. P. D (2013), ' People’s Participation in Development: Sikkim in Perspective', International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 2 (5), pp. 1477-1497.

       x.            Chinsinga. B (2003), 'The participatory development approach under a microscope: the case of the poverty alleviation programme in Malawi', Journal of Social Development in Africa, 18 (No 1), pp. 129-144.

     xi.            Choguill. G. B. M (1996), 'A Ladder of Community Participation for Underdeveloped Countries', Habitat intl, 20 (3), pp. 431-444.

   xii.            Cleaver. F (1999), 'Paradoxes of participation: questioning participatory approaches to development', Journal of International Development, 11, 597-612.

 xiii.            Conrad. C. C and Hilchey. G. K (2011), ‘A review of citizen science and community- based Environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities’, Environ Monit Assess, 176, 273-291.

 xiv.            Cramb. A. R, Purcell. T and Ho. S. C. T (2004), 'Participatory assessment of rural livelihoods in the Central Highlands of Vietnam', Agricultural Systems, 81, 255-272.

   xv.            Cramb. R and Purcell. T (2001), 'How to Monitor and Evaluate Impacts of Participatory Research Projects: A Case Study of the Forages for Smallholders Project', CIAT Working Document, 185.

 xvi.            Danielsen. F., et al (2009), ‘Local Participation in Natural Resource Monitoring:  A Characterization of Approaches’, Conservation Biology, 23(1), pp. 31-42.

xvii.            IAP2 (2006), ‘Techniques for effective Public Participation’, pp 06.

xviii.            Karl. F (2000), ‘Principle of Participation for open Information Community’,Crime and Delinquency, 46(2), 147-155.

 xix.            Kelly. K (1995), 'Evaluating participation processes in community development',Evaluation and Program Planning, 18(4), pp. 371 - 383.

   xx.            Khamung. R (2015), ‘A Study of Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Agriculture Conservation as a Means to Develop Rural Farms as Agritourism Destinations’, Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, 15(3), 1-35.

 xxi.            Korten. D. C (1980), 'Community Organization and Rural Developmen: A Learning Process Approach', Public Admimistration Review, 40 (No 5), pp. 480 - 511.

xxii.            Laah. D. E, Adefila. O. J, and Yusuf. O. R (2013), ‘Community Participation in Sustainable Rural Infrastructural Development in Riyom Area, Plateau State of Nigeria’, Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4, 19.

xxiii.            Looney. E. K (2015), 'China’s Campaign to Build a New Socialist Countryside: Village Modernization, Peasant Councils, and the Ganzhou Model of Rural Development', The China Quarterly, 224, pp. 909-932.

xxiv.            Mak. L. K. B (2017), ‘Community Participation in  the  Decision-Making  Processf or Sustainable Tourism Development in Rural Areas of Hong Kong, China’, Sustainability, 9, pp. 1-13.

xxv.            Malinga. W (2017), 'Decentralisation and Rural Development: Is it a Policy of Empowering or Disempowering Rural Communities in  Zimbabwe?',  International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 6(4), 132-143.

xxvi.            Manor. J (1995), 'Democratic decentralization in Africa and Asia', IDS Bulletin,  26 (2), 81-88.

xxvii.            Marzuki. A (2015), 'Challenges in the Public Participation and the Decision Making Process', Sociologija I Prostor, 201 (1): pp. 21-39, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org.

xxviii.            Mather. S. A, Hill. G, and Nijnik. M (2006), ‘Post-productivism and rural land use: cul de sac or challenge For theorization?’, Journal of Rural Studies, 22, 441-455.

xxix.            Mathur. N. V, Price. F. D A, Austin. S and Moobela. C (2007), 'Defining, identifying and mapping stakeholders in the assessment of urban sustainability', International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment, Glasgow, Scotland.

xxx.            Njoh. J. A (2011), 'Municipal councils, international NGOs and citizen participation in public infrastructure development in rural settlements in Cameroon', Habitat International, 35, pp. 101 - 110.

xxxi.            Nkunika. Z. I. A (1987), 'The Role of Popular Participation in Programmes of Social Development', Journal of Social Development in Africa, 2, 17-28.

xxxii.            Nurlaila. I, Yuliar. S, Kombaitanb. B and Madyo. E. A (2015), 'Public Participation: Energy policy aspect to support rural electrification program  in West Java', Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 168, 321-327.

xxxiii.            Nwaobiala C. U, Ogbonna. M. O and Egbutah. E. U (2014), 'Assessing Levels of Participation among Farmers in IFAD/Fgn/NDDC/Community-Based Natural Resource Management Programme in Abia and Cross River States, Nigeria', Discourse Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 2(5): 136-141.

xxxiv.            Oakley. P (1989), 'Community involvement in health development',  World  Health Organization Geneva.

xxxv.            Oakley. P (1995), 'People's Participation in development Projects: A critical review of current theory and practice', Intrac Occasional Papers Series 7, Oxford.

xxxvi.            Oakley. P., et al, (1991), 'Projects with people: The practice of participation in rural development', International Labour Office, Geneva.

xxxvii.            Park. S (2009), 'Analysis of Saemaul Undong: A Korean rural development programme in the 1970s', Asia-Pacifc Development Journal, 16(2), pp. 112-140.

xxxviii.            World Bank (2000), World Development Report 2000/2001 - Attacking poverty,Oxford University Press.

xxxix.            Xiande. L (2003), 'Rethinking the peasant burden: evidence from a Chinese village', Journal of Peasant Studies, 30, pp. 45 - 74.

     xl.            Xuefeng. H (2007), 'New Rural Construction and the Chinese Path', Chinese Sociology And Anthropology, 39 (4), pp. 26-38.

   xli.            Yansui. L, Yangfen. C and Hualou. L (2011), 'Regional diversity of peasant household response to new countryside construction based on field survey in eastern coastal China', Journal of Geographical Sciences, 21(5), pp. 869-881.

 xlii.            Ye, J. and H. Fu (2015), 'Peasant Innovation and Grassroots Action in China, In Constructing a New Framework for Rural Development', Research in Rural Sociology and Development, 22, pp. 89 - 126.

xliii.            Zomorrodian. A. H, Gill. S. S, Samaha. A. A, and Ahmad. N  (2013),  'Quantitative Models for Participation Evaluation in Community Development: A Theoretical Review', World Applied Sciences Journal, 25(2), 314-322.

Cite this Article: