The influence of Interpersonal Needs on Collaborative Learning Efforts during Participation in Group Assignments and Projects among Limkokwing University Students in Botswana
Author(s)
Bogosi Monyamane , Lindiwe Monyamane ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 25-33 | Views: 572 | Downloads: 172 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4497544
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of Interpersonal Needs on Collaborative Learning Efforts during Participation in Group Assignments and Projects amongst Limkokwing University of Creative Technology students in Botswana. The Fundamental Interpersonal Relationship Orientation - Behaviour (FIRO-B) model was used to determine the extent to which students at Limkokwing University of Creative Technology collaborate during learning. The FIRO-B questionnaire instrument was distributed to 50 student-respondents who were randomly selected. SPSS was used to analyse the data using Descriptive Statistics (Mean and Standard Deviation). The results of the study revealed that Limkokwing University of Creative Technology students have high levels of interpersonal needs rated at (39 - 54) FIRO-B scores. Results indicated that students enjoyed engaging in collaborative learning in all areas of Inclusion, Control and Affection.
Keywords
Fundamental Interpersonal Relationship Orientation- Behaviour (FIRO-B); Students; Collaborative Learning ; Inclusion; Control; Affection; Expressed Behavior; Wanted Behaviour.
References
i. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307–359.
ii. Blatchford, P., Kutnick, P., Baines, E., & Galton, M. (2003). Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 153-172.
iii. Baker, T., & Clark, J. (2010). Cooperative learning – a double-edged sword: A cooperative learning model for use with diverse student groups. Intercultural Education, 21, 257–268.
iv. Blatchford, P., Kutnick, P., Baines, E., & Galton, M. (2003). Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 153–172.
v. Bunderson, J. S., & Reagans, R. E. (2011). Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organization Science, 22, 1182–1194.
vi. Chiriac, E. H., & Granström, K. (2012). Teachers’ leadership and students’ experience of group work. Teachers and Teaching, 18, 345 -363.
vii. Cooper, J., and Robinson, P. (1998). "Small group instruction in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology." Journal of College Science Teaching 27, 383.
viii. Dommeyer, C. J. (2007). Using the diary method to deal with social loafers on the group project: Its effects on peer evaluations, group behaviour, and attitudes. Journal of Marketing Education, 29,175 188.
ix. Gillies, R., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers’ reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 933–940.
x. Freeman, L., &Greenacre, L. (2010). An examination of socially destructive behaviours in group work. Journal of Marketing Education, 33, 5–17.
xi. Frykedal, K. F., & Chiriac, E. H. (2011). Assessment of students’ learning when working in groups. Educational Research, 53, 331–34.
xii. Galton, M., Hargreaves, L., & Pell, T. (2009). Group work and whole-class teaching with 11- to 14-year-olds compared. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 119–140.
xiii. Ha Le, I., Janssen, J., &Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration, Cambridge Journal of Education, 48, 103-122.
xiv. Iloanya, J. (2014). Quality Teacher Education in Botswana: A Crucial Requirement for Effective Teaching and Learning, Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal. 3, 1743 -1749.
xv. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers & Education, 49, 1037-1065.
xvi. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory Into Practice, 38, 67–73.
xvii. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. (2007). The state of cooperative learning in post-secondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 15–29.
xviii. Koutrouba, K., Kariotaki, M., & Christopoulos, I. (2012). Secondary education students’ preferences regarding their participation in group work: The case of Greece. Improving Schools, 15, 245–259
xix. Nguyen, M. P., Terlouw, C., & Pilot, A. (2012). Cooperative learning in Vietnam and the west-east educational transfer. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 32, 137–152.
xx. Ramatlapana, K, A., &Vlaardingerbroek, B (2001). Cooperative Small-Group Learning in Mathematics: A Botswana Study of Student Behaviours and Perceptions. Mosenodi, 9, 47-54.
xxi. Ross, J. A. (2008). Explanation giving and receiving in cooperative learning groups. (R. Gillies, A. Ashman, & J. Terwel, Eds.). New York, NY: Springer
xxii. Shimazoe, J., & Aldrich, H. (2010). Group work can be gratifying: Understanding & overcoming resistance to cooperative learning. College Teaching, 58, 52–57.
xxiii. Schutz, W. C. (1958). FIRO: A three-dimensional theory of interpersonal behavior. Rinehart.
xxiv. Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43–69.
xxv. Smith, B. L., &MacGregor, J. T. (1992). "What is collaborative learning?" In Goodsell, A. S., Maher, M. R., and Tinto, V. (Eds.), Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education. National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, & Assessment, Syracuse University.
xxvi. Van De Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2011). Patterns of contingent teaching in teacher-student interaction. Learning and Instruction, 21, 46–57.
Cite this Article: