The Application of E-Pbb Public Service Innovations in the Lamongan Revenue Service Department and the Obstacle Factors

Author(s)

Ika Devy Pramudiana , Sumartono , Tjahjanulin , Bambang Santoso Haryono ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 64-69 | Views: 598 | Downloads: 172 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4260787

Volume 9 - October 2020 (10)

Abstract

Innovation in the government agencies is needed in the process of providing public services by developing new methods and new resources. In addition, innovations in the public sector can be implemented in order to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of public services. However, in the implementing public service innovations, there are obstacles.
In this study, the sampling technique is purposive sampling. The analysis technique used in this study is using interactive model analysis. According to Miles, Huberman and Saldana.
The results of the research are obstacle factors such as human resources, employee mutations that make the e-PBB public service innovation program not run properly and internet connections are limited, there are some areas or villages that still lack internet signal which can be said that the e-PBB program does not work properly well.

Keywords

Innovation, the obstacle factor for innovation

References

                i.            Albury, David. 2003. Innovation in the Public Sector. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.

      ii.            Cashmere. 2006. Banking Management. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

    iii.            Elina Oksanen-Ylikoski,. Teemu Ylikoski, 2015. Tensions in Creating an Innovative Community of Vocational Education and Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net Volume 2, Issue 2, November 2015

     iv.            Government Regulation No.41 Year of 2007 concerning Regional Apparatus Organizations.

       v.            Lawson Benn, Danny Samson, 2001. Developing Innovation Capability In Organisations: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach, International Journal of Innovation Management Vol. 05, No. 03 2001, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919601000427

     vi.            Lennon John Andrade de Oliveira, Veruschka Franca, Jérsica Florindo, 2020. Relationship among quality management practices, innovation and competitive advantage in manufacturing companies certified with ISO 9001 in Brazil, International Journal for Innovation Education and Research www.ijier.net Vol:-8 No-07, 2020, International Educative Research Foundation and Publisher 

   vii.            Moleong, Lexy J. 2000. Qualitative Research Methodology. Bandung: Rosdakarya teenagers.
 viii.            Miles, A. Michael Huberman and Johnny Saldana. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook Third Edition. Sage Publications: Inc.
     ix.            Noor, Irwan. (2013) Local Government Innovation Design. Malang, UB Press.

       x.            Pio, J. (2020). Effects of innovation and social capital on economic growth: empirical evidence for the brazilian case. International Journal Of Innovation, 8(1), 40-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.5585/iji.v8i1.303

     xi.            Raipa, Alvydas & Vidmante Giedraityte. 2014. Innovation Process Barriers in Public Sector: A Comparative Analysis in Lithuania and the European Union.

   xii.            Rogers, M. Everett, 2002, Diffusion of Innovation 5th Edition, Free Press, New York
 xiii.            Sherwood, L. 2001. Human Physiology, from Cells to Systems.Issue 2. Jakarta: EGC

 xiv.            Schallmo Daniel, Williams Christopher, Boardman luke, 2017. Digital Transformation of Business models, Best Practice, Enablers and Roadmap, International Journal of Innovation Management Vol. 21, No. 8 December 2017.

Cite this Article: