Factors Affecting Teacher Evaluation in Higher Education Institutions: A Citation Analysis

Author(s)

Ms Raeesa Rashdi , Ms Mahvish Khaskhely , Ghazala Panhwar ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 35-49 | Views: 679 | Downloads: 184 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4260719

Volume 9 - October 2020 (10)

Abstract

In higher education, teacher evaluation is conducted in every semester to know their teaching quality. Hence, the purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the factors that affect teacher evaluation practices at university level. This study comprises of two parts identification and analyzation. The main factors identified from literature (secondary data) are instructional and non-instructional and citation analysis was used as a research technique. Findings of this study show that in the category of non-instructional factors, instructor-related factor has more impact on teacher evaluation practice and administrative-related factor has less impact. Moreover, in the category of instructional factors, knowledge about the subject matter has more impact on teacher evaluation practice and teaching method has less impact. Further it can be done through primary collection of data for example, qualitative study to validate the past finding of the literature. The results of this study suggests that management should not make decisions regarding teacher’s evaluation on the basis of instructional factors (filled evaluation forms) but non-instructional factors should also be considered

Keywords

Teacher evaluation, higher education institutions, quality enhancement cell, quality education, citation analysis.

References

                 i.            Ahmadi, M., Helms, M. M., & Raiszadeh, F. (2001). Business students’ perceptions of faculty evaluations. International Journal of Educational Management.

      ii.            Aslam, M. N. (2013). Student rating as an effective tool for teacher evaluation. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, 23(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/01.2013/JCPSP.3741

    iii.            Artés, J., Pedraja-Chaparro, F., & Salinas-JiméneZ, M. del M. (2017). Research performance and teaching quality in the Spanish higher education system: Evidence from a medium-sized university. Research Policy, 46(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.003

     iv.            Alach, Z. (2017). Performance measurement maturity in a national set of universities. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 66(2), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2015-0158

       v.            Amaratunga, D., & Baldry, D. (2002). Moving from performance measurement to performance management. Facilities.

     vi.            Abrami, P. C. (2001). Improving Judgments About Teaching Effectiveness Using Teacher Rating Forms. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2001(109), 59–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.4

   vii.            Ali, H., & Hussain, B. (2018). Analysis of Teaching Evaluation Practices in Universities of Pakistan at Policy Level: Implications for Stakeholders. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 38(2).

 viii.            Angeles, L. (1988). The dysfunctional marriage of formative and summative teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(3), 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123822

     ix.            Avalos, B., & Assael, J. (2006). Moving from resistance to agreement: The case of the Chilean teacher performance evaluation. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(4-5), 254-266.

       x.            Aleamoni, L. M. (1987). Student rating myths versus research facts. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(1), 111-119.

     xi.            Ali, H. I. H., & Ajmi, A. A. S. Al. (2013). Exploring Non-Instructional Factors in Student Evaluations. Higher Education Studies, 3(5), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v3n5p81

   xii.            Al-kuwaiti, A., Maruthamuthu, T., & Kuwaiti, A. Al. (2014). Factors influencing student ’ s overall satisfaction in Course Evaluation Surveys : An exploratory study . Address for correspondence : 2(7), 661–674.

 xiii.            Abiola, O.-O. F. (2013). Students’ Perception of Teachers’ Factors in the Teaching and Learning of English Language in Nigerian Secondary Schools. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(3), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2013.v3n3p173

 xiv.            Afe, J. O., & Egbochukwu, E. O. (2001). Educational Psychology and learning. Lagos: Tony Terry Prints.

   xv.            Bosetti, L. (1994). Official policy and truncated practice: a need to reconceptualise the evaluation of teachers. School organization, 14(1), 49-61.

 xvi.            Bisbe, J., & Malagueño, R. (2012). Using strategic performance measurement systems for strategy formulation: Does it work in dynamic environments? Management Accounting Research, 23(4), 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.05.002

xvii.            Batool, Z., & Qureshi, R. H. (2010). Performance Evaluation standards for higher education institutions", Higher Education Commission.

xviii.            Boring, A. (2017). Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics, 145, 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.006

 xix.            Bachen, C. M., McLoughlin, M. M., & Garcia, S. S. (1999). Assessing the role of gender in college students’ evaluations of faculty. Communication Education, 48(3), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379169

   xx.            Badri, M. A., Abdulla, M., Kamali, M. A., & Dodeen, H. (2006). Identifying potential biasing variables in student evaluation of teaching in a newly accredited business program in the UAE. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540610639585

 xxi.            Bejar, I. I., & Doyle, K. O. (1976). the Effect of Prior Expectations on the Structure of Student Ratings of Instruction. Journal of Educational Measurement, 13(2), 151–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-

xxii.            3984.1976.tb00006.x

xxiii.            Beran, T., & Violato, C. (2005). Ratings of university teacher instruction: How much do student and course characteristics really matter? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(6), 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500260688

xxiv.            Burba, F. J., Petrosko, J. M., & Boyle, M. A. (2001). Appropriate and inappropriate instructional behaviors for international training. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.14

xxv.            Bassi, F., Clerici, R., & Aquario, D. (2017). Students’ evaluation of teaching at a large Italian university: Validation of measurement scale. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 10(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20705948v10n1p93

xxvi.            Basow, S. A., & Montgomery, S. (2005). Student ratings and professor self-ratings of college teaching: Effects of gender and divisional affiliation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 18(2), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-006-9001-8

xxvii.            Costin, F., Greenough, W. T., & Menges, R. J. (1971). Student Ratings of College Teaching: Reliability, Validity, and Usefulness. Review of Educational Research, 41(5), 511–535. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543041005511

xxviii.            Cashin, W. E. (1990). Students do rate different academic fields differently. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1990(43), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219904310

xxix.            Clayson, D. E., & Haley, D. A. (2011). Are Students Telling Us the Truth? A Critical Look at the Student Evaluation of Teaching. Marketing Education Review, 21(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.2753/mer1052-8008210201

xxx.            Clayson, D. E. (1999). Students’ evaluation of teaching effectiveness: Some implications of stability. Journal of Marketing Education, 21(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475399211009

xxxi.            Crumbley, L., Henry, B. K., & Kratchman, S. H. (2001). Students’ perceptions of the evaluation of college teaching. Quality Assurance in Education, 9(4), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006158

xxxii.            Chen, Y., & Hoshower, L. B. (2003). Student Evaluation of Teaching perception and motivation. Evaluation, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293032000033071

xxxiii.            Chen, S. H., Wang, H. H., & Yang, K. J. (2009). Establishment and application of performance measure indicators for universities. The TQM Journal

xxxiv.            Crosby, B. C. (2005). Introduction: Symposium on Leadership Education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 11(3), 167–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2005.12001390

xxxv.            Cuevas, R., Ntoumanis, N., Fernandez-Bustos, J. G., & Bartholomew, K. (2018). Does teacher evaluation based on student performance predict motivation, well-being, and ill-being? Journal of School Psychology, 68(March), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.03.005

xxxvi.            Colby, Susan A., Lynn K. Bradshaw, and Randy L. Joyner. "Teacher Evaluation: A Review of the Literature." (2002).

xxxvii.            Delvaux, E., Vanhoof, J., Tuytens, M., Vekeman, E., Devos, G., & Van Petegem, P. (2013). How May Teacher Evaluation Have An Impact On Professional Development? A Multilevel Analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.06.011

xxxviii.            Dilshad, R. (2010). Assessing Quality of Teacher Education: A Student Perspective. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 30(1), 85–97.

xxxix.            Darling-Hammond, L., & Lieberman, A. (Eds.). (2013). Teacher education around the world: Changing policies and practices.

     xl.            Dobbins, G. H., Cardy, R. L., & Truxillo, D. M. (1988). The Effects of Purpose of Appraisal and Individual Differences in Stereotypes of Women on Sex Differences in Performance Ratings: A Laboratory and Field Study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.551.

   xli.            Dev, S., & Qayyum, N. (2017). Major factors affecting students’ perception towards faculty evaluation of teaching (SET). Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 8(3), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.17499/jsser.30888

 xlii.            Del Boca, F. K., & Ashmore, R. D. (1980). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory. II. A trait-inference approach to the assessment of sex stereotypes. Sex Roles, 6(4), 519-535.

xliii.            Denson, N., Loveday, T., & Dalton, H. (2010). Student evaluation of courses: What predicts satisfaction? Higher Education Research and Development, 29(4), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903394466

xliv.            DAVIES, M., HIRSCHBERG, J., LYE, J., JOHNSTON, C., & MCDONALD, I. (2007). Systematic Influences on Teaching Evaluations: the Case for Caution. Australian Economic Papers, 46(1), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8454.2007.00303.x

 xlv.            Driscoll, L. A., & Goodwin, W. L. (1979). The effects of varying information about use and disposition of results on university students’ evaluations of faculty and courses. American Educational Research Journal, 16(1), 25-37.

xlvi.            Deepa, S., & Seth, M. (2014). An exploratory study of student perception of instructor traits in effective learning. Universal Journal of Management, 2(1), 1-8.

xlvii.            Eng, T. H., Ibrahim, A. F., & Shamsuddin, N. E. (2015). Students’ Perception: Student Feedback Online (SuFO) in Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167, 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.651

xlviii.            Ellis, R. A. (2016). Qualitatively different university student experiences of inquiry: Associations among approaches to inquiry, technologies and perceptions of the learning environment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415616721

xlix.            Ewing, A. M. (2012). Estimating the impact of relative expected grade on student evaluations of teachers. Economics of Education Review, 31(1), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.10.002

        l.            Erdle, S., & Murray, H. G. (1986). Interfaculty differences in classroom teaching behaviors and their relationship to student instructional ratings. Research in Higher Education, 24(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991883

      li.            Feistauer, D., & Richter, T. (2017). How reliable are students’ evaluations of teaching quality? A variance components approach. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1263–1279. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1261083

    lii.            Feldman, K. A. (2007). Identifying Exemplentary Teachers and Teaching. Evidence from Student Ratings, 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5742-3

  liii.            Feldman, K. A. (1986). The perceived instructional effectiveness of college teachers as related to their personality and attitudinal characteristics: A review and synthesis. Research in Higher Education, 24(2), 139–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991885

   liv.            Feldman, K. A. (1983). FeldmanReasearchInHigherEducationVol18Numb1SeniorityAndExperienceteachersVsEvaluationReceiveFromStudents.pdf. 18(l).

     lv.            Felton, J., Koper, P. T., Mitchell, J., & Stinson, M. (2008). Attractiveness, easiness and other issues: Student evaluations of professors on Ratemyprofessors.com. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930601122803

   lvi.            Flores, M. A. (2012). The implementation of a new policy on teacher appraisal in Portugal: how do teachers experience it at school?. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24(4), 351-368.

 lvii.            Gilmour, A. F., Majeika, C. E., Sheaffer, A. W., & Wehby, J. H. (2019). The coverage of classroom management in teacher evaluation rubrics. Teacher Education and Special Education, 42(2), 161-174.

lviii.            Grimes, P. W., Millea, M. J., & Woodruff, T. W. (2004). Grades—Who’s to blame? Student evaluation of teaching and locus of control. Journal of Economic Education, 35(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.35.2.129-147

   lix.            Grunenwald, J. P., & Ackerman, L. (1986). A modified Delphi approach for the development of student evaluations of faculty teaching. Journal of Marketing Education, 8(2), 32-38.

     lx.            Greimel-Fuhrmann, B., & Geyer, A. (2003). Students’ evaluation of teachers and instructional quality-analysis of relevant factors based on empirical evaluation research. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(3), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293032000059595

   lxi.            Hammonds, F., Mariano, G. J., Ammons, G., & Chambers, S. (2017). Student evaluations of teaching: improving teaching quality in higher education. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 21(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2016.1227388

 lxii.            Hamilton, L. C. (1980). Grades, Class Size, and Faculty Status Predict Teaching Evaluations. Teaching Sociology, 8(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.2307/1317047

lxiii.            Hugh Feeley, T. (2002). Evidence of halo effects in student evaluations of communication instruction. Communication Education, 51(3), 225-236.

lxiv.            Hornstein, H. A. (2017). Student evaluations of teaching are an inadequate assessment tool for evaluating faculty performance. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1304016

 lxv.            Hina, K., & Ajmal, M. (2016). Quality Assurance and Enhancement Mechanism in Tertiary Education of Pakistan: Recent Status, Issues and Expectations. Pakistan Journal of Education, 33(1).

lxvi.            Hurney, C., Harris, N., Bates Prins, S., & Kruck, S. E. (2014). The impact of a learner-centered, mid-semester course evaluation on students. The Journal of Faculty Development, 28(3), 55-62.

lxvii.            Isely, P., & Singh, H. (2005). Do higher grades lead to favorable student evaluations?. The Journal of Economic Education, 36(1), 29-42.

lxviii.            Jackson, P. M. (1995). Performance measurement. Public Money and Management, 15(4), 3. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540969509387886

lxix.            Koh, H. C., & Tan, T. M. (1997). Empirical investigation of the factors affecting SET results. International Journal of Educational Management, 11(4), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513549710186272

 lxx.            Kinney, D., & Smith, S. (1992). Age and Teaching Performance. The Journal of Higher Education, 63(3), 282–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1992.11778363

lxxi.            Kallio, K. M., Kallio, T. J., & Grossi, G. (2017). Performance measurement in universities: ambiguities in the use of quality versus quantity in performance indicators. Public Money and Management, 37(4), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1295735

lxxii.            Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1974). Student Ratings of Instruction. Teaching of Psychology, 1(2), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/009862837400100201

lxxiii.            Lueck, T.L., Endres, K.L. and Caplan, R. E. (1993), “The interaction effects of gender on teaching evaluation”, Journalism Education, Autumn, pp. 46-54

lxxiv.            Lejonberg, E., Elstad, E., & Christophersen, K. A. (2018). Teaching evaluation: antecedents of teachers’ perceived usefulness of follow-up sessions and perceived stress related to the evaluation process. Teachers and Teaching, 24(3), 281-296.

lxxv.            Lei, S. A. (2010). Classroom physical design influencing student learning and evaluations of college instructors: A review of literature. Education, 131(1).

lxxvi.            Langbein, L. I. (1994). The Validity of Student Evaluations of Teaching. PS: Political Science and Politics, 27(3), 545. https://doi.org/10.2307/420225

lxxvii.            Martinez, V., Radnor, Z., Radnor, Z. J., & Barnes, D. (2007). Historical analysis of performance measurement and management in operations management. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.

lxxviii.            Merchie, E., Tuytens, M., Devos, G., & Vanderlinde, R. (2018). Evaluating teachers’ professional development initiatives: towards an extended evaluative framework. Research papers in education, 33(2), 143-168.

lxxix.            Murray, Harry G. "The impact of formative and summative evaluation of teaching in North American universities." Assessment and evaluation in Higher Education 9.2 (1984): 117-132.

lxxx.            Mitchell, K. M. W., & Martin, J. (2018). Gender Bias in Student Evaluations. PS - Political Science and Politics, 51(3), 648–652. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651800001X

lxxxi.            Mengel, F., Sauermann, J., & Zölitz, U. (2019). Gender bias in teaching evaluations. Journal of the European Economic Association, 17(2), 535–566. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvx057

lxxxii.            Nargundkar, S., & Shrikhande, M. (2014). Norming of student evaluations of instruction: Impact of noninstructional factors. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 12(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12023

lxxxiii.            Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (2005). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 25(12), 1228–1263.

lxxxiv.            https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510633639

lxxxv.            Nielsen, S. B., & Hunter, D. E. (2013). Challenges to and forms of complementarity between performance management and evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2013(137), 115-123.

lxxxvi.            Oral, B. (2012). Student Teachers’ Classroom Management Anxiety: A Study on Behavior Management and Teaching Management. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(12), 2901–2916. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00966.x

lxxxvii.            Olivares, O. J. (2001). Student Interest, Grading Leniency, and Teacher Ratings: A Conceptual Analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(3), 382–399. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1070

lxxxviii.            Ovando, M. N., & Ramirez, A. (2007). Principals’ instructional leadership within a teacher performance appraisal system: Enhancing students’ academic success. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20(1-2), 85-110.

lxxxix.            Pollitt, C. (2006). Performance management in practice: A comparative study of executive agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui045

   xc.            Parker, L. D. (2012). From Privatised to Hybrid Corporatised Higher Education: A Global Financial Management Discourse. Financial Accountability & Management, 28(3), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2012.00544.x

 xci.            Papay, J. (2012). Refocusing the debate: Assessing the purposes and tools of teacher evaluation. Harvard Educational Review, 82(1), 123-141.

xcii.            Popham, W. J. (1988). The dysfunctional marriage of formative and summative teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(3), 269-273.

xciii.            Peterson, R. L., Berenson, M. L., Misra, R. B., & Radosevich, D. J. (2008). An Evaluation of Factors Regarding Students’ Assessment of Faculty in a Business School*. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(2), 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00182.x

xciv.            Patton, Michael Quinn. "A world larger than formative and summative." Evaluation practice 17.2 (1996): 131-144.

xcv.            Pounder, J. S. (2007). Is student evaluation of teaching worthwhile? An analytical framework for answering the question. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(2), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880710748938

xcvi.            Peterson, R. L., Berenson, M. L., Misra, R. B., & Radosevich, D. J. (2008). An Evaluation of Factors Regarding Students’ Assessment of Faculty in a Business School*. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(2), 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00182.x

xcvii.            Patrick, C. L. (2011). Student evaluations of teaching: Effects of the big five personality traits, grades and the validity hypothesis. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903308258

xcviii.            Radmacher, S. A., & Martin, D. J. (2001). Identifying significant predictors of student evaluations of faculty through hierarchical regression analysis. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 135(3), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980109603696

xcix.            Shah, A. A., Uqaili, M. A., & Qureshi, A. S. (2017). Adoption of quality culture - A case study of Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan. GHTC 2017 - IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference, Proceedings, 2017-Janua, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/GHTC.2017.8239254

       c.            Sahito, Z., & Vaisanen, P. (2017). The Diagonal Model of Job Satisfaction and Motivation: Extracted from the Logical Comparison of Content and Process Theories. International Journal of Higher

     ci.            Education, 6(3), 209-230.

   cii.            Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching: The State of the Art. In Review of Educational Research (Vol. 83). https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313496870

 ciii.            sozer, E. M., Zeybekoglu, Z., & Kaya, M. (2019). Using mid-semester course evaluation as a feedback tool for improving learning and teaching in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), 1003–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1564810

 civ.            Surratt, C. K., & Desselle, S. P. (2007). Pharmacy students’ perceptions of a teaching evaluation process. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj710106

   cv.            Schiefele, U., Streblow, L., & Retelsdorf, J. (2013). Dimensions of teacher interest and their relations to occupational well-being and instructional practices. Journal Für Bildungsforschung Online, 5(1), 7–37.

 cvi.            Schiefele, U., & Schaffner, E. (2015). Teacher interests, mastery goals, and self-efficacy as predictors of instructional practices and student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.06.005

cvii.            Ting, Kwok-fai. "A multilevel perspective on student ratings of instruction: Lessons from the Chinese experience." Research in Higher Education 41.5 (2000): 637-661.

cviii.            Tang, C. (1997). The identity of the nonnative ESL teacher. TESOL quarterly, 31(3), 577-580.

 cix.            Ter Bogt, H. J., & Scapens, R. W. (2012). Performance management in universities: Effects of the transition to more quantitative measurement systems. European Accounting Review, 21(3), 451-497.

   cx.            Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2011). Stimulating professional learning through teacher evaluation: An impossible task for the school leader?. Teaching and teacher education, 27(5), 891-899.

 cxi.            Worthington, A. C. (2002). The impact of student perceptions and characteristics on teaching evaluations: A case study in finance education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930120105054

cxii.            Wagner, N., Rieger, M., & Voorvelt, K. (2016). Gender, ethnicity and teaching evaluations: Evidence from mixed teaching teams. Economics of Education Review, 54, 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.06.004

cxiii.            Wachtel, H. K. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293980230207

cxiv.            Wilson, D., & Doyle, K. O. (1976). Student Ratings of Instruction. The Journal of Higher Education, 47(4), 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1976.11774067

cxv.            Walumbwa, F. O., & Ojode, L. A. (2000). Gender stereotype and instructors ’ leadership behavior : Transformational and transactional leadership. Meeting of the Midwest Academy of Management, Chicago, IL., (July), 22.

cxvi.            Whitworth, J. E., Price, B. A., & Randall, C. H. (2002). Factors That Affect College of Business Student Opinion of Teaching and Learning. Journal of Education for Business, 77(5), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320209599677

cxvii.            Yao, Y., & Grady, M. L. (2005). How do faculty make formative use of student evaluation feedback?: A multiple case study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 18(2), 107.

Cite this Article: