Integrating Video App With a learning Management System: A review from limited Internet Access and Expensive Data Ecosystem

Author(s)

Okoro U.R , Izang Aaron , Adesegun Oreoluwa , Kuyoro Shade ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 09-20 | Views: 661 | Downloads: 123 | DOI:

Volume 10 - May 2021 (05)

Abstract

Recent economic trends have birthed several educational technologies and this can be overwhelming for Teachers and Students in this digital Era. All these new technologies have one thing in common; they support synchronous and asynchronous teaching and learning. School community must understand and accept that there are several socio-economic and technical factors that affect synchronous participation and at the top of the list is cost of data and access to internet. Therefore, the major aim of this expository paper is to create awareness of such impending online teaching data requirements and how to manage such situations without reducing the quality of teaching. Consequentially, synchronous video classes on Slack, Skype, Google Meet, Webex, YouTube Live, Google Hangout, Zoom, or Skype uses between 810 MB to 2.4 GB of data per hour and that is too expensive for participating in multiple video classes per day or in a week. However, using platforms such as Edmodo that allows controlled asynchronous required between 5MB to 110MB to participate in 2 hours of 300 students in class where an average of 310 words is posted every 10 minutes. The first section of this paper highlighted new normal trends that can push educators to adopting different e-learning systems. The second section identifies a major gap affecting the adoption of synchronous learning and the third section suggested practical approaches on Educators on the learn new ways to calibrate their course content while adopting delivery methods that will accommodate the cost and dynamics of online teaching and learning

Keywords

Covid-19, Online-Learning, Synchronous-Learning, Asynchronous-Learning, Blended-Learning

References

i Abdellatief, M., Sultan, A., Jabar, M. A., & Abdullah, R. (2011). A Technique for Quality Evaluation of E-Learning from a Developers Perspective. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 3(1), 157-164.

ii Albert, M., & Beatty, B. J. (2014). Flipping the Classroom Applications to Curriculum Redesign for anIntroduction to Management Course: Impact on Grades. Journal of Education for Business, 89(8), 419-424. doi:10.1080/08832323.2014.929559

iii Cavus, N., Uzunboylu, H., & Ibrahim, D. (2006). The Effectiveness of Using Learning Management Systems and Collaborative Tools in Web-Based Teaching of Programming Languages. Paper presented at the 3rd International Symposium and Education on Electrical, Electronic, and Computer Engineering (ISEECE 2006), 23-25 November, 2006, Near East University, Lefkoşa, Cyprus.

iv Du, Z., Fu, X., Zhao, C., Liu, Q., & Liu, T. (2013) Interactive and Collaborative E-LearningPlatform with Integrated Social Software and Learning Management System, Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Information Technology and Software Engineering, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering 212, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642 34531-9_2, ! Springer-Verlag Berli Heidelberg 2013

v Gault, A. (2017). eLearning for Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator in Textiles and Fashion. Paperpresented at the International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education

vii Hill, C. W., Jones, G. R., & Schilling, M. A. (2014). Strategic management: theory: an integratedapproach: Cengage Learning.

viii Holsapple, C. W., & Lee-Post, A. (2006). Defining, Assessing, and Promoting ELearning Success:An Information Systems Perspective. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(1), 67-85. doi:10.1111/j.1540- 4609.2006.00102.x

ix Jenkins, J., Rumble, G., Murugan, K., Koul, B., Dodds, T., Peters, O., & Perraton, H. (2017). Unit-9Characteristics of Distance Education: IGNOU.

x Lantis, J.S., Kille, K.J. and Krain, M., (2010). The state of the active teaching and learningliterature. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies.

xi Leveaux, R., Gallagher, S., & Sixsmith, A. (2016). Creating a Situated Learning Environment in the Classroom for Final Year IT Students. Paper presented at the 28th IBIMA.

xii Leveaux, R., Gallagher, S., Sixsmith, A. & Simpson, H. (2019). Classroom Evolution: The SwingTowards Blended and Flipped Learning, Journal of e-Learning and Higher Education, Vol. 2019 (2019), 1-13, retrieved from https://ibimapublishing.com/articles/JELHE/2019/560996/, ISSEN : ISSN : 2169- 0359 DOI : 10.5171/2019.560996

xiii Masie, E. (1997). Seizing your intranet. Training & Development, 51(2), 51-53.

xiv Oliveira, P. C., Cunha, C. J. C. de A., & Nakayama, M. K. (2016). Learning Management Systems(LMS) and E-Learning Management: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda, ISTEM - Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 13, (2), 157- 180, ISSN online: 1807-1775 DOI: 10.4301/S1807-17752016000200001

xv Reform, E. (2017). The Glossary of Education Reform, for Journalists, Parents and CommunityMembers. [Online] [Retrieved June 28, 2017] http://edglossary.org/asynchronouslearning/

xvi Rene Leveaux, Sandra Gallagher, Alan Sixsmith and Helen Simpson (2019)," Classroom Evolution: The Swing Towards Blended and Flipped Learning ", Journal of e-Learning and Higher Education, Vol. 2019 (2019), Article ID 560996, DOI: 10.5171/2019.560996

xvii Sailer, C., Kiefer, P., Raubal, M. (2015). An Integrated Learning Management System for Location-Based Mobile Learning. Pp. 1-6.

xviii Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factormodels. Computers & Education, 49(2), 396-413.

Cite this Article:

Okoro U.R, Integrating Video App With a learning Management System: A review from limited Internet Access and Expensive Data Ecosystem, American Based Research Journal 05(2021):09-20 DOI: