Examining Pre-Service Teachers Beliefs about the Nature of Science in the Context of Botswana

Author(s)

Kago Confidence Patrick , Lesego Tawana ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 50-58 | Views: 645 | Downloads: 176 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3948215

Volume 9 - June 2020 (06)

Abstract

There is a general concern that being unaware of pre-service teachers’ beliefs about NOS can be futile to teacher education and development in science education. Thus a quantitative case study approach was employed in the investigation of pre-service science teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science. 78 pre-service teachers of science were randomly selected from a local university in Botswana. Participants responded to a questionnaire using a 4 point Likert scale (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of .743). Data analysis revealed that pre-service teachers’ beliefs about NOS aspects were inconsistent. However, participants’ overall beliefs about the NOS were progressive. These findings have implications on training of science education teachers and development of scientific literacy in Botswana.

Keywords

Beliefs, Botswana, nature of science, pre-service teacher, science education

References

                  i.            Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science and Education. doi 10.1007/s11191-012-9520-2.

      ii.            Akerson, V. L., & Donnelly, L. A. (2008). Relationship among learner characteristics and preservice elementary teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Elementary Science education,20(1),45-58.

    iii.            Slam, O., & Tasar, M. F. (2013). How do science teachers view and teach the nature of science? A classroom investigation. Education and Science, 38(167)

     iv.            Bless, C.  & Kathuria, R.  (2001).  Fundamentals of social statistics:  An African perspective.  Cape Town:  Juta & Co.  Ltd.

       v.            Cakmakci, G. (2012). Pre-service teachers’ ideas about nature of science through educational research apprenticeship. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 32(8)

     vi.            Clough, M. P., & Olson, J. K. (2008). Teaching and assessing the nature of science: An introduction. Science and Education, 17,143-145

   vii.            Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.).London: Routledge.

 viii.            Creswell, J.  W.  (2003).  Research designs:  qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach.  London:  Sage Publications

     ix.            Davison, R. M. (2002). Ethics and research methods. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3439-3445. IEEF.

       x.            Halloun, I. A. (2001). Student views about science: A comparative survey. Lebanon Educational Research Centre, Lebanese University.

     xi.            Hassan, G. (2011). Students’ views of science: A comparison between tertiary and secondary school students. Science Educator, 20(2),54-61.

   xii.            Koksal, M. S., & Cakiroglu, J. (2010). Examining science teachers’ understandings of the NOS aspects through the use of knowledge test and open-ended questions. Science Education International, 21(3), 197-211.

 xiii.            Koosimile, A. T., & Suping, S. M. (2011). Pre-service teachers’ attempts at debating contemporary issues in science education: A case study from Botswana. International Journal of Educational Development, 31, 458-464

 xiv.            Lederman, N.  G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.  L., & Schwartz, R.  S.  (2002). Views of the nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learner’s conceptions of the nature of science. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521.

   xv.            Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138-147.

 xvi.            McComas, W. F. (2017). Understanding how science works: The nature of science as the foundation for science teaching and learning. The School Science review, 98(365).

xvii.            Mellado, V. (1997). Pre-service teachers’ classroom practices and their conception of the nature of science. Science and Education, 6

xviii.            Mihladiz, G. (2012). A comparison between pre-service and in-service teachers’ subject matter knowledge of nature of science. E-international Journal of Educational research, 3(1), 78-96

 xix.            Mihladiz, G., & Dogan, A. (2014). Science teachers’ views about NOS and the place of NOS in science teaching. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116

   xx.            Moeed, A. (2013). Science investigation that best supports student learning: Teachers’ understanding of science investigation. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 8, 537-559.

 xxi.            Patrick, K. C. (2019). University of Botswana student-teachers’ beliefs about the nature, teaching and learning of science. (Unpublished Master’s dissertation). Gaborone: University of Botswana.

xxii.            Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers. Science Education, 77(3), 261-278.

xxiii.            Pelissier, L., & Venturini, P. (2011). Teaching nature of physics in French high schools. European Science Education Research Association Conference, Sept 2011, France.

xxiv.            Sangsa-ard, R., & Thathong, K. (2014). Examining junior high school science teachers’ understanding of the nature of science in Chaiyaphum province, Thailand. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116

xxv.            Stake, R. E. (1998). Case studies. In Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry. London: Sage Publications

xxvi.            Sumranwanich, W., & Yuenyong, C. (2014). Graduate students’ concepts of nature of science (NODS) and attitudes towards teaching NOS. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116

xxvii.            Tafa, E. M. (2012). Authoritarian teaching methods in Botswana schools: Which philosophies underpinned them? Mosenodi Journal, 17(2), 3-27.

xxviii.            Tsai, C. C. (2002). Nested epistemologies: science teachers’ beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 771-783

xxix.            Wiersma, W., & Jurs, G. S. (2009). Research Methods in education: an introduction. Boston:Pearson

Cite this Article: