Effect of Green Procurement on the Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Kenya
Author(s)
Download Full PDF Pages: 01-07 | Views: 615 | Downloads: 161 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3733137
Abstract
The purpose was to determine the effect of green procurement on the performance of manufacturing firms in Kenya. The study was descriptive in a positivist approach. The questionnaire was used to collect data from a random sample size of 386 in 757 manufacturing firms in Kenya registered under the Kenya Association of Manufacturers as of the year 2017. The study was informed by natural resourced based view theory. Findings from the linear regression model showed that green procurement had a significant and positive effect on the performance of manufacturing firms in Kenya. As such, adoption of flexible green procurement practices through appropriate research will help the manufacturing firm to meet diverse yet drastic changing needs as well as address challenges arising from a dynamic global business environment. Therefore, it is of utmost necessity for the firms to use inputs with relatively low environmental impacts
Keywords
Green Procurement, Performance, Manufacturing Firms
References
i. Ahi, P. & searcy, C. (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production, 5(2), 329-341.
ii. Barlett, E., Kotrlik, W. & Higgins, C. (2011). Organizational research: determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information technology, learning, and performance journal, 19(1), 43-56
iii. Blomea, C., Hollos, D. & Paulraj, A. (2013). Gp and green supplier development: antecedents and effects on supplier performance. International journal of production research, 52(1), 32-49.
iv. Carter, R., & Easton, P. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: evolution and future directions. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 41(1), 46-62.
v. Chin, A., Tat, H., & Sulaiman, Z. (2015). Green supply chain management, environmental collaboration and sustainability performance. Procedia cirp, 26 (7), 695-699.
vi. Seuring, S. (2013). A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decision support systems, 54(4), 1513-1520.
vii. Testa, F., & Iraldo, F. (2010). Shadows and lights of gscm (green supply chain management): determinants and effects of these practices based on a multi-national study. Journal of cleaner production, 18(10-11), 953-962.
viii. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180.
ix. Xie, Y., & Breen, l. (2012). Greening community pharmaceutical supply chain in uk: a cross boundary approach. Supply chain management: an international journal, 17(1), 40-53.
x. Eltayeb, T., Zailani, S. and Ramayah, T. (2010), “Green supply chain initiatives among certified companies in Malaysia and environmental sustainability: investigating the outcomes”, Resources Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 55 No. 5, pp. 495-506.
xi. Govindan, K.; Cheng, T.C.E (2011). Environmental supply chain management. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 55, 557–558.
xii. Hart, S.L. (1995) ‘A natural-resource-based view of the firm’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp.986–1014.
Cite this Article: