The Hydraulic Performance of Cylindrical Chamber Trap with Different Baskets Blockage Conditions

Author(s)

Mohamed S ISMAIL ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 11-19 | Views: 713 | Downloads: 181 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3596750

Volume 8 - December 2019 (12)

Abstract

The effect of different baskets conditions on stormwater cylindrical chamber trap (CCT) performance has been experimentally investigated using two different perforated baskets, round and square. With the two different baskets, 0%, 25%, 50% and 75% basket blockage conditions are tested. The results show that the head loss increases proportionally with the increase of flow rate and basket blockage conditions. The head loss coefficient is also obtained to increase with the increase of basket blockage percentages. Data analysis shows that there is no significate change between round and square baskets. Water level and Re number are also presented. This paper is a continues work which has been published by Ismail in 2016

Keywords

Head loss, Head loss coefficient, Basket blockage conditions  

References

  1. Mohamed S Ismail, 2016. “The Laboratory Performance of Cylindrical Chamber Trap”. American Based Research Journal, Vol-5-Issue-7, ISSN (2304-7151), July 2016.
  2. Mohamed Ismail, Hamid Nikraz, Azam Khan and Will Hepburn, 2006. “The Laboratory Test Performance of Two Gross Pollutant Traps”. International Conference on Environment 2006 (Icenv 2006) 13-15 November 2006, Penang, Malaysia.
  3. M. Ismail and H. Nikraz, 2008. “Experimental And Numerical Modelling of VersaTrap Type G”, Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR E-journal. Manuscript LW 08 009. Vol. 1, April, 2008.
  4. M. Ismail and H. Nikraz, 2007. “Rocla VersaTraps: Laboratory Performance Trials” Journal of the Australian Water Association, ABN 78 096 035 773, Volume 34 NO 8. December 2007.
  5. Munson, B. R., Okiishi, T. H., Huebsch, W. W., & Rothmayer, A. P. (2013). Fluid mechanics: Wiley Singapore
  6. Rapp, B. E. (2017). Chapter 9 - Fluids. In B. E. Rapp (Ed.), Microfluidics: Modelling, Mechanics and Mathematics (pp. 243-263). Oxford: Elsevier.

Cite this Article: