Effect of Supply Chain Drivers on Organization Performance. Evidence from Performance of Cement Manufacturing Firms in Kenya
Author(s)
Download Full PDF Pages: 99-108 | Views: 640 | Downloads: 188 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3569364
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of supply chain drivers on the performance of Cement Manufacturing firms. A descriptive research design was used. The target population of the study was Managers or equivalent from Six (6) departments is Procurement, finance, legal, stores, human resource and quality control because they are directly concerned with the supply chain. The sample sizes were 83 respondents from a target population of 500. The study adopted the use of a questionnaire as the main research instrument. The study adopted both quantitative and qualitative approaches, implying that both descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were employed. Quantitative data collected from the questionnaire were analyzed statistically using the Statistical Package for Social Scientist (SPSS version 24). The study tested the significance level of each independent variable against the dependent variable at 95% confidence level using ANOVA, Correlation and regression techniques. The results revealed that commitment from the top management and lead to an effective collaboration between the firm and its suppliers. Furthermore, collaboration with the suppliers plays an instrumental role in reducing the lead time. Therefore, firms have to work collaboratively to serve the customers.
Keywords
Top Management Support, Lead Time, Organization Performance, Supply Chain Drivers
References
i. Arani, W., Mukulu, E., Waiganjo, E. & Wambua, J. (2016). Strategic Sourcing an Antecedent of Resilience in Manufacturing firms in Kenya. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Science, 6(10), 1-18.
ii. Arshinder, K, Kanda, A., Deshmukh, S.G. (2011). A Review on Supply Chain Coordination: Coordination Mechanisms, Managing Uncertainty and Research Directions, International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg.
iii. Axsater, (2013). Exact and approximate evaluation of Batch-ordering system for two-level distribution systems. Operations Research, 41, 777-785.
iv. Baiman, S., & Rajan, M. (2012). Incentive issues in inter-firm relationships. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 213-238.
v. Bergman, B., & Klefsjo, B. (2010). Quality from customer needs to customer satisfaction. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
vi. Boyd, L., & Gupta, M. C. (2014). Constraint management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(4), 350-371.
vii. Chia, R. (2012). The Production of Management Knowledge: Philosophical Underpinnings of Research Design, in Partington, D. (ed.) Essential Skills for Management Research, SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, 1-19.
viii. Cox A., Lonsdale C., Watson G., Wu Y. (2004) Supplier relationship management as an investment: evidence from UK study, Journal of General Management, Vol 30, No 4, pp. 27-42.
ix. Deuermeyer, B., L. Schwarz, (2011.) A model for the analysis of system service level in warehouse retailer distribution system
x. Fawcett SF, Magnan GM (2012). The rhetoric and reality of supply chain integration. International Journal of Distribution Logistics Management 32(5), 339–361
xi. Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & Tirtiroglu, E. (2001). Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21 (1), 71-87.
xii. Huan, S.H., Sheoran, S.K., Wang, G. (2004). A review and analysis of supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model. Supply Chain Manage International Journal, 9(1), 23–29.
xiii. Kimani, C. W. (2013). Management Challenges in Kenya Petroleum Industry: Case of National Oil Corporation of Kenya, International Journal of Social Sciences and Entrepreneurship, 1(3), 231-246.
xiv. Lambert, D., & Cooper, M. (2016). Issues in supply chain Management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 65-83.
xv. Lee, H., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (2007). Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect. Management Science, 50 (12), 1875-1886.
xvi. Moinzadeh, K. (2011). An improved ordering policy for continuous review distribution systems with arbitrary inter-demand time distributions. IIE Transactions, 33, 111–118.
xvii. Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Nairobi: Acts Press.
xviii. Musa SN (2011) Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management, International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1), 25–34.
xix. Okello, J. O., & Were, S. (2014). Influence of supply chain management practices on performance of the Nairobi Securities Exchange’s listed, food manufacturing companies in Nairobi. International Journal of Social Sciences and Entrepreneurship, 1(11), 107-128.
xx. Ouyang, L.H., Wu, K.-S., & Ho, C.H. (2017). An integrated vendor-buyer distribution model with quality improvement and lead time reduction. International Journal of Production Economics, 108, 349-358.
xxi. Pitamber, H. U. H., & Dharup, M. (2014). Distribution control and valuation systems among retail SMEs in a developing country. Mediterranean Journal of Social Science, 5(8), 81-88.
xxii. Sahin, F. & Robinson, P. (2012). Flow coordination and information sharing in supply chains: review, implications and directions for future research. Decision Science, 33(4), 505–536.
xxiii. Schein, E. (2014). Organizational culture and leadership (3 uppl.). San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass.
xxiv. Sharafali, M. (2010). Some models for understanding the cooperation between supplier and the buyer. International Journal of Production Research, 38(15), 3425–3449.
xxv. Topan, E. and Bayindir, Z. P., (2012). Multi-Item Two-Echelon Spare Parts Distribution ... Warehouse Under Compound Poisson Demand (August 2012)
xxvi. World Bank (2016). Kenya Country Economic Memorandum. From Economic Growth to Jobs and Shared Prosperity. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank: Washington D.C.
Cite this Article: