Creating Innovative Home Economics Classrooms: The Role of the Teacher

Author(s)

Dr. (Mrs) B.E. Uwameiye ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 01-07 | Views: 770 | Downloads: 193 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3456947

Volume 8 - July 2019 (07)

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the role of the teacher in creating an innovative Home Economics classroom. The study was guided by three research questions. The population consisted of 96 Home Economics teachers in the Edo State of Nigeria.  A Questionnaire “RHETCICQ” was utilized for data collection. The data was analyzed using the means score. The mean score was ranked in descending order. The findings revealed that on role of the teacher in the organization of creative Home Economics classrooms; teachers are to act as facilitators, having cordial relationships with students, Introduce technology wisely in Home Economics lessons, encourage collaboration by helping students to work with others and creating a place for all categories of learners during Home Economics lessons. Strategies of teaching; Teachers should  utilize new techniques and technologies that are trendy in the Home Economics profession, Integrate technologies common among students to learn in a natural way, integrate technologies common among students so as to make them learn in a natural way and Utilize teaching strategies that are involving and are different from day to day. Qualities of teachers expected in an innovative Home Economics Classrooms : Teachers should be creative  and skillful in adapting to the needs of the students, Flexible in adapting to technology, dedicated and tolerant to students, should be involved in lifelong learning and always updating skills. It is recommended that Home Economics teachers should update their skills and appropriate attitude through various self improvement programmes such as in-service training, attending conferences and workshops

Keywords

Home Economics, Adapting, Technology, Innovation, Integration

References

         i.        Aderogba, A.A(2007).The use of Information and Communication Thecnology for Quantitative Science education in NigeriaSecondarySchools.Ikere Journal of Education,2, 8 – 15.

ii.      Akomolafe, C.O (2011), Managing Innovations in Educational System in Nigeria: A Focus on Creating and Sustenance of Culture of Innovation. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies(JETERAPS), 2(1): 47-52.

iii.    BLendow, D, Dyrenfurth, M.J (1994) Technology education in schools and industry; Emergingdiadactics for human resource development. Berlin, Germany, Springer- Verlag in cooperation with NATO. Scientific Affairs Division.

iv.     Farah Naz, H.S.M (2017) Innovative Teaching has Positive impact on the performance of diverse Students

v.       Imogie, A.I(1999) Do you Know Who is Teaching your Child. Inaugural Lecture Series 53. University of Benin. Benin City.Pg 4 -5.

vi.     Davis,K.C (2012) The Effects of Technology Instruction on the Academic  Achievement of Fifth Grade Students. A dissertation Presented to Liberty University. Retrieved 16th February, 2013.Http://www.goggle.com.

vii.   GoatleyV.j and Johnston (2013) Innovation Research and Policy Evolution in Classroom Teaching. Language Arts, Volume 91 (2)94 -104

viii. Guri-Rosenblit, S,  Sebkova, H. , &Teichler, U., (2007).Massification and Diversity of Higher Education system; Interplay of complex Dimension. Higher Education Policy, 20,373-389

ix.     Molokwu, N.(2004).The Challenges of Reducing Poverty in Nigeria; Repositioning Home Economics for Sustainable Education. Being a Lead Paper Presented at the 8th Annual Conference of Home Economics Annual Research Association of Nigeria. UNN.Sept 5 -8.

x.       Nigeria Educational Research and Development Council ( NERDC,2007). 9- Year Basic Education Curriculum  Home Economics for Junior Secondary School 1-3.Abuja, Nigeria.

xi.     Ojo, A.K (2007).The Effect of the Sensitized Teaching on Student’s Acquisition of Home Economics Practical Skills, Attitudes and Cognitive Achievement. A Thesis Dissertation, University of Benin. Unpublished.

xii.   Omekwu, C.O.(2019) Smart Schools : New Frontiers for Education in Digital Age.

xiii. Faculty of Education, Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma.5thDistinquished Guest Lecture.May, 14th 2019.

xiv. Omidinia S, Masron, M, Selamat, H.( 2013)An Examination of the Concept of Smart School: An innovation to Address Sustainability. 2nd International Conference on Advances in Computer Science and Engineering Available at https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/An-

xv.   Paliwala, A (2001) “Learning in cyber space “ The journal of information,  law and technology(JILT). Available at http:llelj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/01-1/paliwala.html.

xvi. Thompson,J ( 2015) “Poor grades”  Inside Higher Ed, July 9 Available at www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/poll-find-overrall-dissatisfaction-college-selection-process-while-parents. (accessesedAugust 20,2016)

xvii.   Tapscott, D.(2009).Grown up digital: How the Next Generation is Changing your World.

xviii.  Temple .T. (2013) Focusing on students success: Assesment of learning outcomes in blended environments. Paper Presented at the Lily Conference on College and University Teaching. Greensboro, NC.

Cite this Article: