Effect of Corporate Social Legal Responsibility on Customer Loyalty: A Survey of Telecommunication Firms in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya
Author(s)
Nevile Ogetii Marita , Nelly Nyatichi Marita ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 69-76 | Views: 716 | Downloads: 175 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3456927
Abstract
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been used by many companies to gain public confidence through providing essential commodities of some high value to a customer, particular in telecommunication industry where only one mobile operator has dominated the market share for the last one decade. The study objective was to determine the effect of legal responsibility on customer loyalty. Carroll model and Stakeholder theory were used to explaining the study. The study employed an explanatory research design. The study targeted all customers of telecommunication companies in Uasin Gishu County. Stratified sampling was used to group the population while the systematic sampling technique was used to obtain 400 customers. A structured questionnaire was used for data collection. The reliability of the questionnaire was checked using Cronbach Alpha test. Data was purely quantitative. Data collected were coded and analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. The study found that CSR legal initiatives positively impact on customer loyalty. It’s therefore important for telecommunication firms to act as good citizen in all matters beyond the law, operate under the laws and regulations and ensure adequate steps are taken against all forms of discrimination. Telecommunication firms should engage in CSR in order to create a positive attitude on their customers to enhance loyalty.
Keywords
Corporate Social Responsibility, Legal responsibility, Customer loyalty, and Telecommunication firms
References
i. Bolton, Ruth N. and James H. Drew (1991), A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Service Changes on Customer Attitudes, Journal of Marketing, 55 , 1–9.
ii. Bowen, J.T., & Chen, S.L. (2001). The relationship between customer loyalty and customer satisfaction. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 13(5), pp.213-7.
iii. Bowen, John T. and Shiang-Lih Chen (2001), The Relationship between Customer Loyalty and Customer Satisfaction, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 13 (4/5), 213-217.
iv. Campbell, J. L. 2004. Institutional change and globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
v. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance framework. Academy of Management Journal, 4(4) pp.479- 505.
vi. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38, 268-295.
vii. Carroll, A. B. (2000). A commentary and an overview of key questions on corporate social performance measurement. Business & Society, 39, 466-478.
viii. Carroll, A. B. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, July-August: 30-48.
ix. De Vaus, D. A.: 2001, Research Design in Social Research (SAGE Publication, London).
x. Dean, D. H. (2004). Consumer Reaction to Negative Publicity: Effects of Corporate Reputation, Response, and Responsibility for a Crisis Event. Journal of Business Communication, 41(2), 192 – 211.
xi. Drumwright, M.E. and Murphy, P.E. (2001), Corporate societal marketing. In: Bloom, P.N. and Gunlach, G.T. (Eds.), The Handbook of Marketing and Society, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, pp. 162-183.
xii. Fisch, Jill E. 2006. Measuring efficiency in corporate law: The role of shareholder primacy. Iowa Journal of Corporation Law 31(Spring): 637.
xiii. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston:Pitman
xiv. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and the corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3), 364-369. Retrieved from http://orgsci.journal.informs.org/
xv. Friedman, M. (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits, The New York Times Magazine (13 September).
xvi. Galaskiewicz, J. 1991. Making corporate actors accountable: Institution-building in Minneapolis-St. Paul. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis; 293–310. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
xvii. Neyman, J. (1934), On the two different aspects of the representative method: the method of stratified sampling and the method of purposive selection, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 97, 558-606.
xviii. Oliver, R.L. 1999. Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of marketing, 63, 33-44.
xix. Onlaor,W. and Rotchanakitumnuai,S. (2010), Enhancing Customer Loyalty towards Corporate Social Responsibility of Thai Mobile Service Providers, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 42
xx. Palmatier, Robert W., Dant, Rajiv P., Grewal, Dhruv & Evans, Kenneth R. (2006). Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Relationship Marketing: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 136–53.
xxi. Pavlos A Vlachos (2011) Corporate Social Responsibility: Attributions, Loyalty and the Mediating Role of Trust. Journal of Selected works.
xxii. Pramanik. Prakash and Cyan Prakash, 2007,Service Loyalty Measuring Index For Banking Services: A Comperative Study Of Private And Public Banks, international journal of business tomorrow.
xxiii. Stuart, H. (2004), Risky Business: Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility. In: J. Wiley and P. Thirkell ((Eds), Marketing Accountabilities and Responsibilities, Proceedings of the Australia and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference, [CD Rom].
xxiv. Swaen, V. and Chumptaz, R. C. (2008), Impact of Corporate social responsibility on consumer trust, Journal of Application on Marketing, 23, 7-33.
xxv. Yamane, Taro. 1973. Statistics: an introduction analysis. Singapore: Times Printers, c1973. 3rd ed
xxvi. Webb, D.J. and Mohr, L.A. (1998), A Typology of Consumer Responses to Cause-related marketing: From Skeptics to Socially Concerned, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17 (2), pp. 226-238.
Cite this Article: