Innovative Teaching Strategies and Chemistry Achievements at Secondary Level
Author(s)
Saeed Ahmad , Muhammad Arshad ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 67-74 | Views: 961 | Downloads: 210 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3456199
Abstract
The research study was conducted to investigate the effects of innovative teaching strategies (simulation, brainstorming, peer tutoring, cooperative learning, discovery learning, inquiry learning, and role play) on academic achievements at the secondary level in the subject of Chemistry. The study was experimental research by nature, so pre-test, post-test control group design was adopted and the sample of eighty (80) students of 9th grade from Govt. High School Warburton (City) out of the population of 387 students were divided into control and experimental groups with 40 students (control group) and (experimental group) each. Units (1-4) from the chemistry book 9th grade published by Punjab Text Book Board Punjab were selected as contents of study and two achievements tests (Pre & Post) in chemistry were developed having 20 multiple choice items. The validity of the instruments was assured by the expert opinions of three experts and the reliability of the instruments was assured using test-retest techniques having 0.856 Pearson’s product moment. Pre and post tests were administered to the Experimental and Control groups by the researcher along with the two other teachers and data was collected. The data collected were tabulated, mean score and standard deviation statistics were used to explore the answers of the research questions while the t- test statistics were employed to test the hypothesis for the analysis and interpretation of data. It was concluded from the analysis and interpretation of data that innovative teaching strategies affect the academic achievements positively and was recommended that Government may ensure the implementation of the law of teaching the science subjects at the secondary level with innovative teaching strategies to enhance the academic achievements of the students
Keywords
Innovative teaching strategies, Chemistry, Achievements, Secondary level
References
i. Abdullahi Naser, M. A. (2015). The Effect of Using Brainstorming Strategy in Developing Creative Problem Solving Skills among male Students in Kuwait: A Field Study on Saud Al-Kharji School in Kuwait City. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.3, 2015.
ii. Acar, B. & Tarhan, L. (2007). Effects of cooperative learning on students’ understanding of metallic Bonding. Journal of Research in Education.
iii. Akinbobola, A.O. (2006). Effects of cooperative and Competitive learning strategies on Academic Performance of students in physics. Journal Research in Education, 3(1), 1-5.
iv. Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, eds. (2000). How People Learn. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
v. Campbell, S.H. (2010) Clinical Simulation. In K.B. Gaberson and M.H. Oermann (eds) Clinical teaching strategies in nursing (3rd ed.) (pp. 151-81). New York: Springer.
vi. Effective Instructional Strategies (2005, September). Research Corner: Education Data and Research Analysis from Edvantia. Retrieved Nov 15, 2013, from Professional Development Collection database, 68
vii. Fu, K., Murphy, J., Yang, M., Otto, K., Jensen, D., & Wood, K. (2015). Design-by-analogy: Experimental evaluation of a functional analogy search methodology for concept generation improvement. Research in Engineering Design, 26(1), 77–95.
viii. Gaba, D. M. (2004). “A brief history of mannequin-based simulation and application,” in Simulators in Critical Care and Beyond, W. F. Dunn, Ed., Society of Critical Care Medicine, Des Plaines, Ill, USA.
ix. Huang, F., & Su, J. (2010). Study of teaching model based on cooperative learning. Studies in Literature and Language. 1 (6), 3-5
x. Jayalaxmi (2016). Importance of innovative teaching methods an evaluative study of traditional and modern teaching techniques-a survey International Journal of Current Research and Modern Education 1(1)
xi. Jolliffe, W. (2005). The Implementation of cooperative learning in the classroom. Paper Presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Gloamorgan, 14-17 September 2005.
xii. Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2000). History and philosophy of science through models: some challenges in the case of ‘the atom’. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 993-1009.
xiii. Lingo, A. (2014). Tutoring Middle School Students with Disabilities by High School Students: Effects on Oral Reading Fluency. Education & Treatment of Children, 37(1), 53-76.
xiv. Mary SS (2014). Current pedagogical teaching strategies being used by educators at the Kwazulu Natal College of nursing campuses across varied subjects and their views regarding Innovative methodologies. A dissertation, Department of Nursing, Durban University of Technology, South Africa.
xv. Mengping, T. (2014). Mathematics Synchronous Peer Tutoring System for Students with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 115-127.
xvi. Rajesh Kumar Sharma (2017). Emerging Innovative Teaching Strategies in Nursing, JOJ Nurse Health Care, 1(2): JOJNHC.MS.ID.555558 (2017)
xvii. Ruban A (2014) A Study on Innovative Teaching Learning Practices in Colleges; Conference proceedings; International conference on enhancing excellence, equity and efficiency in higher education, Chennai, India, DOI: 10.13140/2.1.4024.0322.
xviii. Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J.(2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 342-375.
xix. Scheckel, M. (2012) Selecting learning experiences to achieve curriculum outcomes. In D.M. Billings and J.A. Halstead (eds) Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (4th ed.) (pp. 170 -87) St Louis MO: Sauders Elsevier.
xx. Siegel, C. (2005). Implementing a research based model of cooperative learning. The Journal of Educational Research. 98 (6).1-15.
Cite this Article: