Effect of Internal Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Financial Performance: Evidence from Kenya Commercial Bank

Author(s)

Valentine Jepkorir Morogo , Doreen Chebet Cheluget , Beth Wambui Mwangi ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 01-09 | Views: 750 | Downloads: 166 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3441812

Volume 5 - November 2016 (11)

Abstract

his study investigated the effect of internal corporate social responsibilities on financial performance in Kenya commercial bank. The study was guided by social exchange theory. Explanatory research design was used to find cause effect relationship. The study’s target population was 283 employees from 3 branches of Kenya Commercial Bank in Uasin Gishu County in Kenya. Stratified and random sampling technique was used to select a sample size of 165. Primary data was collected using structured questionnaire and interviews schedule. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics such as measures of central tendency and inferential statistics such as Pearson correlation and multiple regression model. Multiple regression model was used to test the hypotheses. The study showed that employee welfare (β1 = 0.172, s.e (β1) =0.041, ρ=0.000) and equity (β2 = 0.097, s.e (β1) =0.043, ρ=0.026) had significant effect on financial performance of firm, Thus, internal CSR practices enhance firm financial performance. Therefore, the study recommends that firms should encourage and promote employee welfare so that employees have the gusto to perform tasks and renewed energy. Moreover, equity should be implemented fully

Keywords

Internal CSR practices, equity, financial performance, employee welfare

References

i.        Aguilera, R.V., Rupp, D.E., Williams, C.A. and Ganapathi, J. (2007), “Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multi-level theory of social change in organizations,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 836-63.

ii.      Albdour and Altarawneh (2012), Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Engagement in Jordan, International Journal of Business and Management; Vol. 7, No. 16

iii.    Ali I, Rehman KU, Yilmaz AK, Nazir S, Ali JF (2010). Effects of corporate social responsibility on consumer retention in cellular industry of Pakistan.Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 4(4):475-485.

iv.     Bhattacharya, C. B., &Sen., S. 2008. Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1): 9-24.Calderon, 2011

v.       Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.

vi.     Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility. Business and Society, 38[3], p. 268-295.

vii.   Cornelius, N., Todres, M., Janjuha-Jivraj, S., Woods, A., & Wallace, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and the social enterprise.Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 355-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9500-7

viii. Cowling A, Mailer C (1992). Managing Human Resources.2nd Edition. London: Edward Arnold.

ix.     Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874.

x.       Dex, s.And smith, c. (2001b) ‘employees’ access to family-friendly policies and practices,' judge Institute research paper wp16/2001, Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

xi.     Dex, s. And smith, c. (2001c) ‘employee Commitment as an outcome of family-friendly Policies?’ judge institute research paper wp 20/ 2001, Cambridge: university of Cambridge.

xii.   Dex, S., and Smith, C. (2002). The nature and pattern of family-friendly employment policies in Britain. Bristol: Policy Press and Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

xiii. Finger J (2005). The Management Bible.New Holland Publishers Ltd.

xiv. Forum on the Workplace of the Future, 2005.Working to Our Advantage: A National Workplace Strategy. Dublin: National Centre for Partnership and Performance.

xv.   Gavin, J.F., & Maynard, W. S. (1975).Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility.Personnel Psychology, 28, 3, 377-387.

xvi. Harwood, T., Garry, T. and Broderick, A. (2008) Relationship Marketing: Perspectives, Dimensions, and Contexts, Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill.

xvii.                       Heslin PA, Ochoa JD (2008). ‘Understanding and developing strategic corporate social responsibility.'Organizational Dynamics, vol 37, no 2, pp 125–44.

xviii.                     Hoskins, T (2005) The ICSA Corporate Social Responsibility Handbook: Making CSR Work for Business, London: ICSA Publishing.

xix. Kirsh B, Krupa T, Cockburn L, Gewurtz R. 2009. Understanding the stigma of mental illness in employment. Work: a Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation 33:413–425

xx.   Matten, D., Crane, A., &Chapple, W. (2003). Behind the mask: Revealing the True Face of Corporate Citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1/2), 109-120.

xxi. McGuire, J., & McDonnell, J. (2008).Relationships between recreation and levels of self- determination for adolescents and young adults with disabilities. Career development for exceptional individuals, 31(3), 154-163.doi: 10.1177/0885728808315333

xxii.                       McWilliams, A., Siegel. D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1-18

xxiii.                     Monks, K. (2007). The Business Impact of Equality and Diversity - The International Evidence. National Centre for Partnership and Performance / Equality Authority

xxiv.                      Osterman P (2010). Work Reorganization in an Era of Restructuring: Trends in Diffusion and Effects on Employee Welfare’. at http://web.mit.edu/osterman/www/work-reorg.pdf.

xxv.                        Owusu-Acheaw M (2010). Staff Development and Employee Welfare Practices and their Effect on Productivity in Three Special Libraries in Ghana.Assessed Online on 14 May 2010 at http://ajol.info/index.php/glj/article/view/33975.

xxvi.                      Public Sector Management Act 2006http://www.legislation.act.gov.au/a/2006-37/default.asp

xxvii.                    Public Sector Management Act 2008.http://www.legislation.act.gov.au/di/2008-187/default.asp

xxviii.                  Rutherford, S., and Ollerearnshaw, S. (2002): The business of diversity. How organizations in the public and private sectors are integrating equality and diversity to enhance business performance. Schneider-Ross, Andover, Hants.www.sdchneiderpross.com

xxix.                      Schlesinger, L. and Heskett, J. (1991), ``Breaking the cycle of failure in services'', Sloan Management Review, Vol. 32, Spring, pp. 17-28.

xxx.                        Singh RK (2009). Welfare Measures and its impact on Manpower Productivity: Assessed Online on April 11, 2009, at http://www.indiamba.com/faculty-column/fc992/fc992.htm)

xxxi.                      Skudiene, V. &Auruskeviciene, V. (2010).The contribution of corporate social responsibility to internal employee motivation.Baltic Journal of Management, 7

xxxii.                    Smith, H. J. (2002a, summer). The shareholders vs. stakeholder’s debate.MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 85-90. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/smr

xxxiii.                  Thorndike EL. The fundamentals of learning. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University; 1932

xxxiv.                  Torjman S (2004), Culture and recreation Links to wellbeing: The caledonn institute of social policy

xxxv.                    Yamane, Taro. 1973. "Statistics: an introduction analysis." Singapore: Times Printers, c1973. 3rd ed

Cite this Article: