Towards a Description of Word, an Urdu Corpus-Based Approach

Author(s)

Muhammad Akram , Abrar Hussain Qureshi ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 36-45 | Views: 846 | Downloads: 187 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3413058

Volume 3 - April 2014 (04)

Abstract

A great deal of scholarly discussion has centered on the linguistic status of the word. It would be useful to draw attention to two fairly general and constant characteristics of words across a wide range of languages. The first is that a word is typically the smallest element that can be moved around without destroying the grammaticality of the sentence (ignoring any semantic effects) But no means all word are equally mobile in this sense, but with very few exceptions, the smallest mobile units are words. The morphemes constituting a single word have a rigidly a fixed sequential order. The second major characteristic of words is that they are typically the largest units that resist „interruption‟ by the insertion of new material between their constituent parts. Even these two traditional views about the phenomenon of word do not cover all the mechanism of word. It was due to this reason that the term “Lexical Item” was introduced. Let us debate in detail that what the inconsistencies were in the traditional concept of “word” and how the “Lexical item” is a useful and neutral hold –all term that captures and helps to over come instabilities in the term “Word”. 

Keywords

Urdu Corpus, Description of Word 

References

         i.        Balhouq, S.A. (1976). The Place of Lexis in Foreign Language Learning Unpublished M.A. Thesis submitted to University of Scheffield.

ii.      Branford, W. (1967) The Elements of English : An Introduction To the Principles of Study of Language, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

iii.    Cruse, D.A. (1986) Lexical Semantics Oxford University Press.

iv.     Halliday, M. A. K. (1961) Categories of the Theory of Grammar. Word 17: 241–292.

v.       Haspelmath, M. (2002). Understanding morphology. London: Arnold (co-published by Oxford University Press).

vi.     Hay, J. (2000). Causes and Consequences of Word Structures, A PhD thesis, Northwestern University

vii.   Katamba, F.(2005) English words. Routledge Taylor and Francis group London and New York.

viii. Kramsky, J. 1969 The Word as a Linguistic Unit. Mouton. The Hague and Paris.

ix.     Lyons, J.(1968) Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

x.       Sailer, M. (2003). Combinatorial Semantics and Idiomatic Expressions in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Ph.D thesis, Unpublished

xi.     Schmmit, N. (2000) Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Cite this Article: